Retiring DuPont Co. General Counsel Tom Sager traveled to Philadelphia for a meeting at Ballard Spahr in the early 1990s as part of his oversight of DuPont's outside counsel convergence program.
- Pair Can't Get Punitives Vacated After Settlement
- Superior Court Throws Out $2.5 Mil. Verdict in Fall Case
- Florida Lawyers Driving Boom in N.J. Disabled-Access Suits
- Defendants May Now Have Easier Time Changing Venue in Pa.
- Leaders Managing 'Staggering' Costs of Firm Merger Talks
- Justices Take Up Hospital's Liability for ER Doc's Acts
The Insurance Law Supplement includes articles on food contamination, settlement without consent, the definition of "occurrence," employer's liability exclusions and more.
Looking for a Pennsylvania law firm that specializes in a niche practice area? Then consult The Legal Intelligencer's newly published Boutique Law Firm Guide for 2014.
The uphill battle defendants faced when trying to get their cases moved from a plaintiff's chosen venue has been leveled somewhat thanks to the state Supreme Court's decision last month in Bratic v. Rubendall, according to attorneys who spoke with the Law Weekly.
The state Supreme Court has agreed to hear argument on whether a plaintiff may state a claim for vicarious liability against a hospital for the alleged conduct of an emergency room doctor by pointing out that she was part of an emergency response team and had not previously treated the patient.