Judge Disagrees With Colleague's Dismissal of Legal Mal Case

, The Legal Intelligencer


In response to an appeal of the dismissal of a legal malpractice suit, a Philadelphia judge said her former colleague's decision to toss the case was "inappropriate."

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Shelly Kozel

    While the case is interesting..what is most interesting is for attorneys to check their Lawyer‘s Professional Liability Policy for: because Noonan and his firm, Walfish & Noonan, represented themselves pro se, they did not have professional liability insurance. Does your LPL cover you for "Pro Se " work?

    Read more: http://www.thelegalintelligencer.com/id=1202666260031/Judge-Disagrees-With-Colleagues-Dismissal-of-Legal-Mal-Case

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202666260031

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.