Pa. Justices Call for Tougher Attorney Discipline

, The Legal Intelligencer

   | 3 Comments

Two of the state's Supreme Court justices have called for harsher punishment for repeat violators of the attorney disciplinary rules.

What's being said

  • Sign, Mrs. Clayton

    ALERT!
    As I have already addressed an exact issue, surrounding an "attorney" Blake Horwitz(in Elois Poole-Clayton V Blake Horwitz and Erica Faaborg), , Professional Rule 8.4(submitted in my BRIEF concerning my Civil suit against Horwitz), CLEARLY states that Horwitz was negligent along with him committing other "professional" rule violations, which states that "fi any of these rules are violated, the attorney is responsible for EACH violation at a cost of 5K for EACH violation"
    NOTE: I filed a complaint with the ARDC and they used a LAME excuse that "because Horwitz had never been prosecuted before, he won‘t this time either".
    NOTE: I say, there is a first time for everything AND because he has gotten away with misconducts before(I‘ve been informed that he has messed oTHER families out of money in this manner), isNOT(nor should it be), ANY excuse for allowing him to be COVERED by the ARDC for his MISCONDUCTS!
    That is a VIOLATION of public trust as well as any other violation of public trust and it should be prosecuted as a crime as anyone else is prosecuted for their alleged crimes!
    He and others(this 2014), should be included in the ILLINOIS JUDICUARY REPORT BOOK!
    PS: Currently(2014), after learning of the TRUE character of my current "landlord"/SLUMLORD(Mike Manisorac, his "att", Mr. COHEN, should be disciplined for the attempts of MANY SORTS INCLUDING DECEIT/DECEPTIVE PRACTICES, in an illegal EVICTION(which began as ‘RETALIATORY‘, because I informed this landlord that I wanted to take down the interest to my Security money.
    This landlord/slumlord, then asked I for more rent money AFTER he served I ANOTHER illegal eviction notice because I no longer emphathize with his pancreas problems which have him in and out of the hospital, which I mneglected my OWN health to support him with the issues he still have on the property I reside at at 1613 N. Leclaire Ave., Chicago.
    The "att." Cohen, stated to I one thng but before the court attempted to get the judge to say that I was going along with ALL of Mike‘s illegal actions.
    Mike‘s efforts are to get OUT of the ‘TENANT RIGHTS VIOLATIONS‘ he has violated for (9) years now.
    A ‘MOTION‘ has been filed against him to CORRECT his misconducts (as willa CIVIL suit), for the DAMAGE done to my property, that this arrogant slumlord boldly stood in my apartment and said, "I‘m just going to deny being responsible for it";(damage from his LEAKY ROOF, which included MILDEWWATER;damaging my VELVET SOFA, the back of my COMPUTER DESK, along with this apartment being RAT infested, ROACH infested and SPIDER inspected(now).
    ALSO, he has NO security, which has caused MY RIGHT, to live in a peaceful environment unhabitable.
    I have been under tremendous STRESS his activities and has been perscribed medication from my doctor, because I FEAR that he is attempting to illegally have I removed(by the sheriff).
    NOTE: I have never heard a laondlord say that he‘s serving a tenant a (5) day OR (30) day eviction notice "because you‘re not happy here".
    This is ALL in ‘RETALIATION‘ because I informed him that he has to pay to have my SOFA professionally cleaned.
    I‘ll see him and/or, his "atty.", in court!

  • D.G.

    Correction - case is 2011-25251.

  • Diane Gochin

    Another L.I. article falls short -the entire self-regulating judicial system is a farce. Especially when pro se litigants complain against attorneys expanding cases, not cooperating with the rule- the complaints are ignored.. aren‘t they Alan Davis? There is an abuse of process case against attorney Randee Feldman you all should follow in Montgomery County - 2011-25151..its going to get interesting if Judge Haaz doesn‘t do her a favor and dismiss the case.. she is clearly guilty of expanding a divorce for seven years and assisting her client in dissipating the entire estate. Paul Troy - her attorney- also abused the process. Alan Davis ignored my complaint to the disciplinary board twice over seven years.. Would someone like to tell me why any divorce should take seven years? But I guess I am beat by the orthopedic surgeon whose case took 16 years. The system is after all run on the hourly rate system - which is a complete conflict of interest with receiving justice.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202649410108

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.