Health Care Law

N.J. Supreme Court Rules on Providers' Discovery Obligations

, The Legal Intelligencer


On July 18, the Supreme Court of New Jersey held that a health care provider has no duty on account of an assignment of benefits executed by an insured to provide an insurer with information relative to the provider's ownership structure, billing practices or referral methods of the providers from whom an insured received treatment. The case is styled as Selective Insurance Co. of America v. Hudson East Pain Management, 46 A.3d 1272 (2012).

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202569200427

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.