Steven J., Inc. v. Salisbury Township Zoning Hearing Board, PICS Case No. 12-1674 (C.P. Lehigh Aug. 6, 2012) McGinley, J. (18 pages).


The Legal Intelligencer


Plaintiff was not entitled to a variance by estoppel from conditions limiting the number of residents at its personal care home and requiring installation of a sprinkler system where plaintiff could not prove that the township actively acquiesced to his failure to fulfill those conditions and where that failure posed a risk to public health and safety. Affirmed.

This premium content is reserved for The Legal Intelligencer subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202571401134

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.