Retirement Age Suits Before Justices in Harrisburg Session

, The Legal Intelligencer

   | 2 Comments

Making their way before the state Supreme Court on expedited review, two lawsuits challenging Pennsylvania's mandatory judicial retirement age headline an oral argument session in Harrisburg scheduled to begin today.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Darren McKinney

    Regardless of how that comp-time bill may ultimately fare in the U.S. House, Mr. Hicks, no one should have high hopes for it should it reach the Big Labor- and Big Lawsuit-controlled Senate.

  • Kenneth J. Hicks

    I wonder if the legislation working its way through Congress, regarding an alleged choice of cash overtime and compensatory time in the private sector, if grandfathered, would be grounds to toss out the class action settlement against Wal-Mart.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202598967403

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.