Insurance Law

Was UIM Carrier Prejudiced by Late Notice of 'Phantom' Vehicle?

, The Legal Intelligencer

   | 6 Comments

The state Supreme Court heard oral argument last week in a case over whether an insurer was prejudiced by an insured's failure to timely indicate that a "phantom" vehicle had been involved in an accident before making a claim for uninsured motorist benefits.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Alice Ann Belmonte Gates

    was this a fraudulently confiscated vehicle as mine was fraudulenly claimed abandoned that is on public record of my "88" Chevy Suburban by the fraud and abuses of PENN DOT; :Law Frims and the Courts from this Abuse of Qui Tams; Quasi Rem Jurisdictions; Quantium Culpabilities Fraud of ID Real ID abuses in PA. No Mention of the Type of the PHANTOM VEHICLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Alice Ann Belmonte Gates

    was this a fraudulently confiscated vehicle as mine was fraudulenly claimed abandoned that is on public record of my "88" Chevy Suburban by the fraud and abuses of PENN DOT; :Law Frims and the Courts from this Abuse of Qui Tams; Quasi Rem Jurisdictions; Quantium Culpabilities Fraud of ID Real ID abuses in PA. No Mention of the Type of the PHANTOM VEHICLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Alice Ann Belmonte Gates

    was this a fraudulently confiscated vehicle as mine was fraudulenly claimed abandoned that is on public record of my "88" Chevy Suburban by the fraud and abuses of PENN DOT; :Law Frims and the Courts from this Abuse of Qui Tams; Quasi Rem Jurisdictions; Quantium Culpabilities Fraud of ID Real ID abuses in PA. No Mention of the Type of the PHANTOM VEHICLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Alice Ann Belmonte Gates

    was this a fraudulently confiscated vehicle as mine was fraudulenly claimed abandoned that is on public record of my "88" Chevy Suburban by the fraud and abuses of PENN DOT; :Law Frims and the Courts from this Abuse of Qui Tams; Quasi Rem Jurisdictions; Quantium Culpabilities Fraud of ID Real ID abuses in PA. No Mention of the Type of the PHANTOM VEHICLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Alice Ann Belmonte Gates

    was this a fraudulently confiscated vehicle as mine was fraudulenly claimed abandoned that is on public record of my "88" Chevy Suburban by the fraud and abuses of PENN DOT; :Law Frims and the Courts from this Abuse of Qui Tams; Quasi Rem Jurisdictions; Quantium Culpabilities Fraud of ID Real ID abuses in PA. No Mention of the Type of the PHANTOM VEHICLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Alice Ann Belmonte Gates

    was this a fraudulently confiscated vehicle as mine was fraudulenly claimed abandoned that is on public record of my "88" Chevy Suburban by the fraud and abuses of PENN DOT; :Law Frims and the Courts from this Abuse of Qui Tams; Quasi Rem Jurisdictions; Quantium Culpabilities Fraud of ID Real ID abuses in PA. No Mention of the Type of the PHANTOM VEHICLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202599615736

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.