From the Chief

Old Judges Don't Fade Away, They Simply Sue to Stay

, The Legal Intelligencer

   | 1 Comments

Judges, like professional athletes, rarely know when it's time to hang it up. Like pro athletes, because they're insulated from the public — for good reason — and people routinely suck up to them, they can sometimes lose touch with reality and how they're perceived.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to LexisAdvance®.

Continue to LexisAdvance®

Not a LexisAdvance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via LexisAdvance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • In Agreement

    I totally agree and whether good or bad, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court should have rejected assuming jurisdiction over these cases and left it up to the people by vote. Its fundamentally unfair for Judges to dictate--which is quasi-communistic--when they should retire or rule on the constitutionality of a provision which requires them to retire at a certain age, especially and in light of the fact, four Justices on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, according to the challenged statutes, would be required to retire within the next (6) years. That is not how the American System of Jurisprudence works nor does it follow any constitutional mandate. It is a slick or fast way of disrupting the flow of the legislation and we call these men and women challenging these laws Fundamentally Fair Judges when they are trying to curtail valid process and are the probably the same Judges whom are frustrated when they are ordered to hear and determine disputes brought before them. Just saying-

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202599964891

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.