Explaining the High Court's Work Product and Efficiency

, The Legal Intelligencer


A recent opinion piece by Howard Bashman, "Adding Judicial Efficiency to the Appellate Conversation," published June 11 in The Legal, citing no statistics, claims that the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is inefficient and does not work hard. The author claims that "sizeable delays" are "plaguing" the court's work; allocaturs and appeals proceed "at ... a glacial pace" and suffer "chronic backlogs"; allocaturs "are routinely taking over a year to be decided"; the court lacks a "culture of judicial efficiency"; and the court "at some point ... will need to bear down and do the hard work necessary" to address the issues he raises. The assertion that the court does not work hard is profoundly mistaken: I know this for a fact and the court's work product proves it.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to LexisAdvance®.

Continue to LexisAdvance®

Not a LexisAdvance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via LexisAdvance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

  • not available

    it works hard if you own a casino. you get expedited service legislated into the deal. pathetic and disgraceful but typical of the corruption destroying the judiciary

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202611546649

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.