3rd Cir. Upholds Rejection of $7 Mil. Class Settlement

, The Legal Intelligencer

   | 2 Comments

Denying final approval of a $7 million class settlement with National City Bank for alleged discriminatory lending practices was the right move in light of intervening U.S. Supreme Court precedent, the Third Circuit has ruled.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • blake edwards

    "this lawsuit is clearly a serious matter. A Federal jury found that
    Attorney General Fisher retaliated against two former narcotics
    agents for exercising their First Amendment right to free
    speech. Moreover, the jury found that Attorney General Fisher
    had acted maliciously or wantonly toward the plaintiffs. They
    awarded $1 million in punitive damages against him and other
    defendants. In short, Mr. Fisher has been found liable by a
    jury for serious misconduct in office. We should all be
    concerned by this." RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, U.S. SENATOR WISCONSIN




  • blake edwards



    In 2003, for some reason, arlen was in a great hurry to push fisher onto the circuit court

    NAF responded, "Fisher has a clear conflict of interest that should be resolved before he is considered for a seat on the Third Circuit.

    In February of this year, a federal jury determined that Fisher and other defendants had violated the civil rights of two state narcotics agents and awarded $1.5 million in damages. Of that amount, $225,000 in actual and punitive damages were assessed against Fisher personally for his role in the retaliation.14 A spokesperson for Fisher has stated that the Attorney General's office plans to appeal the verdict.15

    If appealed, this case would be heard by the Third Circuit, the very court to which Fisher is nominated. The pending lawsuit and troubling issues it raises make Fisher's nomination inappropriate at this time. Depriving employees of their civil rights is an extremely serious matter that demands thorough investigation and consideration. The transcript of the trial itself is more than 1,000 pages, and the jury's verdict is to be reviewed by the trial court as well as the court of appeals. Fisher should not have been nominated until this matter was resolved, and the Committee should wait until the case is concluded and it has the opportunity to review the entire case history in order to assess Fisher's fitness for a lifetime judicial appointment. It would be unprecedented for a nominee to be confirmed to a court in which he is a litigant in a pending case."

    think about it. no one else was qualified?

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202614920744

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.