Receiver Sues Blank Rome Over Document Production

, The Legal Intelligencer


The receiver of a financial services company that turned out to be a Ponzi scheme has sued Blank Rome in an effort to compel the production of client files the firm has related to one of the scheme's lenders.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to LexisAdvance®.

Continue to LexisAdvance®

Not a LexisAdvance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via LexisAdvance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

  • Paul Carpenter

    I am confused. What is the purpose of a conference "in the matter" on 8/28? They have not-complied with 2 subpoenas so far. A third one was issued and the judge gave them until 8/21 to comply and also schedules a conference even before the deadline arrives, for one week after the deadline.

    Why is the party, which is not in compliance, not sanctioned?

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202615664965

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.