Criminal Practice

Public Scrutiny Leads to Questions About Informant Usage

, The Legal Intelligencer

   | 1 Comments

Determining when a case is strong enough to prosecute and when a confidential informant might be too compromised to take the witness stand are decisions typically made behind closed doors.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • The biggest problem with using confidential informants is that the term itself is widely misunderstood and has many different meanings. This means that the person is not managed properly to meet the desired results. Furthermore, the management systems and records kept by law enforcement are inadequate and officers receive little if any training to perform the role. To illustrate my point how can an informant be viewed as confidential if they are providing evidence in a court. Surely they are a witness. Attaching the term confidential informant to them brings with it a host of prejudices that cloud the judgement of prosecutors, judges and jurors. The term confidential informant needs revisited by all involved. IF any one wants to discuss further please contact me.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202651688341

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.