Tactics of Federal Defenders Under Scrutiny Again P.J. D'Annunzio and Hank Grezlak, The Legal Intelligencer June 30, 2014 | 1 Comments share share by mail share on linkedin Facebook share on twitter share on google+ Share With Email Send Thank you for sharing! Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided. print reprints Federal defenders, who have already faced criticism from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and a federal judge over their tactics, are now being asked to explain themselves to the U.S. Supreme Court. Sign up for a free digital membership and get great benefits like: Already Registered? Sign In now 5 free articles* every 30 days, from other ALM publications Exclusive discounts on ALM events and products The Legal Intelligencer digital newsletter, plus your choice of more than 30 digital newsletters Access on the device of your choice: smartphone, tablet, or desktop Unlimited free access to Corporate Counsel and Law Technology News online Create Account with LinkedIn Register Now *May exclude premium content VIEW COMMENTS ( 1 ) ADD COMMENT What's being said Sign In Terms & Conditions Alex Bunin Jun 28, 2014 I do not understand your use of the term "federal defenders." That term typically refers to attorneys employed by federal defender organizations pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 3006A. This appears to be a non-profit organization without such federal funding. Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here. Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202661290263 Send Thank you! This article's comments will be reviewed.