State Agencies Grapple With E-Discovery Process

, The Legal Intelligencer


When the state Supreme Court ordered the attorney general to produce discoverable documents in the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission corruption cases earlier this month, Chief Justice Ronald D. Castille said that office still needs to review approximately 30 million subpoenaed electronic documents for privilege purposes before turning them over to the defendants.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Legaltech News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

  • Mark Kerzner

    Why not use open source eDiscovery called FreeEed?

  • Andy Wilson (

    This article is spot on. The issues of e-discovery are mirrored with FOIA requests: lots of data, little time, and little budget. eDiscovery tech is starting to help state and local with both discovery and FOIA woes and we are an example of that change:

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202666986966

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.