Products Liability

Justices Won't Review Decision That Cement Danger Is Jury Question

, The Legal Intelligencer

   | 0 Comments

A decision saying it was a jury question—and not a matter of law—whether caustic wet cement was unreasonably dangerous has been allowed to stand as the Pennsylvania Supreme Court declined to review the products liability case.

This premium content is reserved for The Legal Intelligencer subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202799287644

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.