Criminal Practice

Rule 404(b) and the Pa. Supreme Court's Discontent

, The Legal Intelligencer


No area of law may be more ­vexing, and more subject to dispute, than the admission or exclusion of "other acts" evidence—often mis-labeled "prior bad acts" evidence—in criminal cases. Evidence of an "act" that only ­conveys the actor's character is inadmissible; but ­evidence with a non-character purpose may be admissible, subject to a balancing test.

This premium content is reserved for The Legal Intelligencer subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202790464977

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.