Arbitration Awards, Legal Representation and Public Policy

, The Legal Intelligencer


Articles have recently appeared in The Legal Intelligencer considering whether and when courts may review and vacate the awards of arbitrators. Usually, they have focused on whether review based upon a manifest disregard of the law by the arbitrator remains a viable ground in light of the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Hall Street Associates v. Mattel, Inc., which appeared to limit the grounds for review and vacatur to those set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act. Other articles have considered what may be considered a conflict of interest on the part of an arbitrator.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202473487478

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.