Pennsylvania Supreme Court Parts Ways With U.S. Supreme Court on Collateral Order Appeals
About five years ago, my colleague Carl Solano and I wrote an article for the Pennsylvania Bar Association Quarterly regarding Pennsylvania’s collateral order doctrine. Among other things, we noted that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has consistently relied on federal precedents involving the doctrine when construing Pennsylvania’s own version of the doctrine, now codified in Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 313. Although this has traditionally been the case, in a significant recent decision involving privilege issues and the collateral order doctrine, the court has expressly rejected the reasoning and holding of a United States Supreme Court decision on the same topic.
This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.
To view this content, please continue to LexisAdvance®.
Not a LexisAdvance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via LexisAdvance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org