22 Front Street, LLC v. Gorodetzer, PICS Case No. 13-0921 (C.P. Philadelphia March 6, 2013) Glazer, J. (24 pages).


The Legal Intelligencer


The court granted in part defendant attorneys' request for a protective order because exceptions to attorney-client work product doctrine did not apply here and defendants' former clients could not unilaterally waive the communications privilege with respect to a co-client. Affirmance recommended.

This premium content is reserved for The Legal Intelligencer subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202600593016

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.