Inherent Flaws in the Test for Reasonable Expectation of Privacy

, The Legal Intelligencer


In his famous concurrence in Katz v. United States, U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Marshall Harlan II articulated the two-pronged test still used to determine whether an area is protected by the Fourth Amendment.

This premium content is reserved for The Legal Intelligencer subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202621203331

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.