EvidenceBen Seal, The Legal Intelligencer
Ineligible Expert Insufficient to Justify Continuance, Court Rules
A legal malpractice plaintiff is not entitled to a continuance to seek an expert to testify despite learning shortly before a scheduled trial that his intended expert was ineligible, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has ruled.
This premium content is reserved for The Legal Intelligencer subscribers.
Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.
Already a subscriber? Log in now