CRIMINAL LAW

Commonwealth v. Herman, PICS Case No. 17-0885 (Pa. May 25, 2017) Saylor, C.J.; Donohue, J., concurring and dissenting. (38 pages).

SUPREME COURT

The Legal Intelligencer

   | 0 Comments    | SEE FULL TEXT OPINION

Designer drug provision of controlled substance act not unconstitutionally void-for-vagueness with respect to the "substantially similar" requirement, where average person would understand scope of "substantially similar," and additional scienter requirement of provision alleviated additional vagueness concerns. Order of the trial court affirmed in part and reversed in part.

This premium content is reserved for The Legal Intelligencer subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202789815676

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.