Will 'Bristol-Myers' Exclude Tort Actions From—or Draw Them to—Pa.?

, The Legal Intelligencer

   | 2 Comments

The U.S. Supreme Court's recent game-changing decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court of California is widely seen as the beginning of the end for mass torts in several venues that have historically attracted large-scale litigation, including California and Missouri. But, for Pennsylvania, the ruling is expected to be much more of a mixed bag, and, according to some, could instead lead to an uptick in suit against certain defendants.

This premium content is reserved for The Legal Intelligencer subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now

What's being said

  • Laura Turpin

    How, or will, this ruling affect women in Canada who have a lawsuit with Johnston and Johnston

  • arciazelllaa

    How would you like to learn the best trading system there is? Become successful in your trades by learning the perfect method in trading google Superior Trading System.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202790842324

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.